Internet

Predicting Violent Behaviors with Behavioral Health Software

We presently reside in a society that’s “an atmosphere favorable to criminality:” almost all aspects of the largest types of entertainment involve violence and anti-social behavior (movies, television, game titles, etc.) the press grows fastest on violence and anti-social behavior (count the amount of such tales versus “good” or “nice” news) without useful behavioral health software society generally originates to simply accept violence and anti-social behavior (we abide such actions within our communities and schools, our criminal justice product is virtually an ineffective turning door, etc.) so we expend assets to safeguard ourselves usually once a tragic event has happened. Quite simply, we might nothing like it, but we really do – or can perform – little about it. We try to look for causes of violent behavior, and then try to find methods to “predict” it hoping stopping it. But is really a high goal even possible? Or does the idea of stopping problems exist only theoretically, not reality or functionality? Consider: “Behavior modification” is a superb term and concept – provided we have an idea regarding whose behavior we’re trying to change.

Once the threat is exterior for an organization, exactly how should we start to know which from the next 732 persons to go in a center may be the one whose behavior needs modifying? Exactly how should we start to determine if the “behavior modification” techniques that may focus on 731 of individuals persons works around the 1 who’ll really function as the next shooter? If none of individuals 732 use a shooting rampage today, does which means that our “behavior modification” techniques were effective – or that not one of them simply chose today because the day-to shoot? Etc. etc. etc. We have seen good examples in our efforts to locate a new method to predict the following shooter each time another incident happens (and incidentally, nothing Forecasts behavior – certain actions without behavioral health software might be indicated, but none of them could be PREDICTED). But the truth is that there’s practically nothing we are able to do because, even if many people begin to see the signs, there is nothing done because “if you notice something, say something” isn’t socially acceptable, or perhaps is unlike HIPAA (once the see-er is really a mental or medical health professional), or perhaps is something which “… I would do later… ” or whatever.

Families, bosses, co-employees, fellow class mates, etc. see things every single day which are indications of potential violent behavior, but do nothing at all because it just isn’t politically correct or they are busy or they didn’t realize the things they were seeing or perhaps a million other excuses. After every new incident comes another discussion of the identical things, and also the answers are always exactly the same – nothing will get transformed, because nothing can definitely be transformed. Because even if troubles are indicated before they occur, we still rarely do anything whatsoever about the subject until once they have happened. Security professionals don’t control business purse strings or even the miracle answer to the CEO’s psyche using the behavioral health software, therefore we cannot implement what we all know will virtually steer clear of the criminals from doing most bad things more often than not. And every one of the studies and nice terminology and fancy graphs won’t ever change this. Even though agencies like the U.S. Secret Service perform a congrats of behavioral analysis, remember they have a whole division of pros who just behavioral analysis.

No Comments Found

Leave a Reply